- Quarter Zip Sports
- Posts
- Why the NFL Keeps Winning While Other Sports Lose Steam
Why the NFL Keeps Winning While Other Sports Lose Steam
Golf’s Biggest TV Moments, Quarter Zip Investigates Deadliest Catch Camera Crew
Flip on your TV any Sunday in the fall, and you'll see it plain as day: the NFL is still king. While other major sports leagues—MLB, NBA, even the once-untouchable college football world—have seen their TV ratings wobble or slide, the NFL continues to post monster numbers. The question is, why?
Let’s start with the obvious: the NFL is built for modern attention spans. There are 17 games per team, per season. That’s it. Every game matters. Contrast that with baseball’s 162-game marathon or the NBA’s 82-game grind, and it’s no wonder the average fan can stay locked in. You don’t need to devote six months to understand playoff implications. One upset in Week 10 can change everything. Urgency is baked into the schedule.
But it’s more than just fewer games. The NFL is a TV juggernaut. It’s perfectly scheduled: Sunday afternoons? Sacred. Sunday nights? Blockbuster. Monday nights? Tradition. And now we’ve got Thursday nights on Amazon and even international games that kick off with breakfast. It dominates the calendar in a way that other sports just can’t.
Then there’s fantasy football and sports betting. The NFL leaned in hard. Every touchdown, field goal, and turnover matters not just to fans of the teams, but to millions of people managing fantasy rosters or watching lines shift in real time. The league didn’t just tolerate gambling—it partnered with it. That move brought in a whole new wave of diehard, data-driven fans who watch for way more than just the final score.
Meanwhile, other sports have stumbled. MLB’s viewership has aged significantly, and while pitch clocks and rule changes help, the casual fan still doesn’t feel the urgency in June or even August. The NBA, on the other hand, struggles with load management and a perceived lack of competitiveness during the regular season. Great postseason moments, sure—but getting there? It can feel like a slog. Even college football’s traditional regional charm is being diluted by conference realignment and constant playoff expansion talk. The product is still great, but the soul feels a little less intact.
The NFL also does a better job of being in the headlines year-round. Free agency is a spectacle. The draft? Practically a national holiday. Training camp updates, fantasy previews, schedule releases—there’s always something. It’s not just a season—it’s a 365-day machine.
None of this is to say other sports are in trouble. They all still pull massive audiences and generate billions. But when it comes to dominating the cultural and broadcast landscape, the NFL isn’t just holding steady—it’s widening the gap. Other leagues can take notes, but at this point, it might just be a different game entirely.
The Super Bowl Is Still the King of TV — By a Mile
When it comes to TV viewership in the U.S., no event even sniffs the Super Bowl. It’s not just a game—it’s a cultural ritual. Whether you’re in it for the football, the halftime show, or the commercials, chances are you’re watching. And the numbers? They’re absurd.
Here’s a timeline cleanser for everyone
The last 2:30 of Super Bowl 43. Enjoy.
— Steelers Network (@SteelersNetwork)
7:42 PM • Nov 6, 2024
Let’s put it into perspective. The most-watched golf broadcast of all time—Tiger Woods winning the 1997 Masters—pulled in about 44 million viewers. A nice number. But the least-watched Super Bowl in the last 15 years? Still cleared 90 million.
Top 10 Most-Watched Super Bowls in U.S. History
Rank | Super Bowl (Year) | Viewers (Millions) |
---|---|---|
1 | LVIII (2024, Chiefs-49ers) | 123.4M |
2 | LI (2017, Patriots-Falcons) | 113.7M |
3 | XLIX (2015, Patriots-Seahawks) | 114.4M |
4 | LVI (2022, Rams-Bengals) | 112.3M |
5 | LVII (2023, Chiefs-Eagles) | 115.1M |
6 | 50 (2016, Broncos-Panthers) | 111.9M |
7 | XLVIII (2014, Seahawks-Broncos) | 112.2M |
8 | XLVI (2012, Giants-Patriots) | 111.3M |
9 | XLVII (2013, Ravens-49ers) | 108.7M |
10 | XLV (2011, Packers-Steelers) | 111.0M |
Bottom line: If golf, baseball, or basketball are niche blockbusters, the Super Bowl is a summer Marvel movie on steroids. And every February, it breaks its own box office.
Golf’s Biggest TV Moments Still Can’t Touch the NFL — But That’s Okay
Golf might be having a moment—but let’s keep it in perspective. Even during its most electric broadcasts, golf’s TV numbers are a different universe compared to the NFL. A thrilling Masters finish or a U.S. Open playoff might draw headlines, but they don’t pull 25 million viewers on a random Sunday night like Cowboys vs. Eagles can. And that’s fine. Golf isn’t built for mass chaos. It’s built for drama.
Take a look at the most-watched golf broadcasts in U.S. television history:
Top 10 U.S. Golf Broadcasts (Final Round Viewership)
Rank | Event (Year) | Avg. U.S. Viewers |
---|---|---|
1 | 1997 Masters | ~44M |
2 | 2013 Masters | ~14.7M |
3 | 2015 Masters | ~14.0M |
4 | 2018 Masters | ~13.0M |
5 | 2025 Masters | ~12.7M (peak 19.5M) |
6 | 2019 Masters | ~10.8M |
7 | 2021 U.S. Open | ~8.5M |
8 | 2013 U.S. Open | ~8.4M |
9 | 2014 PGA Championship | ~8.2M |
10 | Ryder Cup Final Day (est.) | ~8M+ |
What stands out?
Tiger’s 1997 Masters win is the gold standard.
I mean there’s some truth to the first part. The top 5 in the 1997 Masters included three guys who combined for 2 PGA Tour wins and 4 major top 10s outside of this, plus two legends who were pushing 50 at this point.
— HAVE FUN EXPECT TO WIN (@anchorofgold)
2:08 PM • Jun 2, 2025
Nothing else comes close.
Well, maybe not nothing.
Happy Gilmore 2 makes Netflix history. 🤯
(H/T: @Variety)
— Golf Digest (@GolfDigest)
8:20 PM • Jul 29, 2025
Rory’s 2025 Masters breakthrough pulled impressive numbers too, peaking at nearly 20 million. But compared to even a mid-tier NFL playoff game? It’s a blip.
Golf doesn’t need to beat the NFL. It just needs those rare Sundays where everything aligns—history, emotion, and a few million viewers glued to the back nine. That’s when the game hits differently.
Have you subscribed to the email newsletter?

Life Behind the Lens on Deadliest Catch: Where Cameramen Sleep and What They’re Paid to Risk It All
If you’ve ever watched even five minutes of Deadliest Catch, you already know it’s not your average reality TV show. It’s gritty, dangerous, and as raw as it gets—full of towering waves, flying crab pots, and exhausted, sleep-deprived fishermen trying to pull a living out of the icy Bering Sea. But while the captains and deckhands get all the screen time, there's another group of brave souls who risk just as much (if not more) behind the scenes: the camera crew.
That’s right—those beautifully chaotic shots of water smashing into the deck, GoPros clipped to cranes, and night-vision footage of exhausted crew members all come courtesy of a small group of elite cameramen. But have you ever stopped to ask: where do they sleep? Or better yet, how much do they get paid to live through that kind of madness?
Let’s dive into the wild life of the Deadliest Catch camera crew.
With lives at risk and danger at every turn, the crew of Titan Explorer is forced to abandon ship.
The epic new season of #DeadliestCatch premieres on a brand new night, Friday August 1 at 8p on @Discovery.
— Deadliest Catch (@DeadliestCatch)
11:04 PM • Jul 29, 2025
First Off—Yes, They Actually Sleep on the Boats
Forget hotel rooms or cozy production trailers parked nearby. There’s none of that on the Bering Sea.
Each fishing boat—like the F/V Northwestern, Time Bandit, or Wizard—hosts one or two embedded cameramen who live onboard with the crew for weeks at a time. They sleep in the same tight, smelly, metal bunks as everyone else. We're talking below-deck, barely enough room to roll over, maybe six square feet of personal space, and a constant symphony of creaking, groaning, engine noise, and clanking crab pots. Oh, and don’t forget the ever-present smell of fish, diesel, and wet socks.
There’s no “camera crew quarters.” There's just whatever tiny bunk is free, often shared or rotated depending on shifts. These guys are living in full survival mode right alongside the fishermen. If the crew gets four hours of sleep in a 24-hour span, the cameraman gets the same—or less—because they’re still logging footage, charging batteries, and planning shots between naps.
Honestly? That’s as hardcore as it gets in the world of nonfiction TV.
It’s Not Just Sleeping—It’s Surviving
Let’s be clear: being a Deadliest Catch cameraman isn’t just about pressing record. It’s about dodging swinging gear, shooting in sub-zero wind chills, and securing thousand-dollar cameras while the deck literally tries to throw you into the sea. They’re soaked. They’re cold. They’re exhausted. And they still need to get the shot.
To make things worse, seasickness is a real problem—especially for first-time operators. You might imagine a seasoned sailor manning the camera, but plenty of top-tier camera ops come from film school, wildlife documentaries, or war zones. The Bering Sea is its own kind of battlefield.
Some get used to it. Some throw up for a week straight. Some never come back.
Any crew must be fully prepared to be up against this MONSTER of a storm. ⚓️
— Deadliest Catch (@DeadliestCatch)
1:00 AM • Jun 25, 2019
So, What Do They Get Paid?
Now we’re getting to the part that makes you say, “Wait, that’s it?”
Camera operators on Deadliest Catch typically earn between $2,000 and $4,500 per week, depending on their experience, specific role, and whether they’re embedded on a boat or working from Dutch Harbor. More specialized roles like field producers or technical directors may earn upwards of $5,000 to $6,000 per week, especially if they oversee multiple crews or direct camera placement across several boats.
Let’s do some quick math: if an embedded cameraman works a 6-week fishing trip, they could earn $12,000 to $27,000 for that stretch. But—and it’s a big but—they’re also working 16-20 hour days, risking life and limb, and living in conditions that would make a prison cell feel like a Marriott.
Annual earnings for a Deadliest Catch shooter? Likely in the range of $30,000 to $60,000, assuming they film one or two seasons and do some additional work in post-production or other shows.
Worth It? Depends Who You Ask
Is $3,000 a week good money? Sure. But is it good money for standing on an icy deck with a $40,000 camera strapped to your chest while a 35-foot wave tries to kill you?
That’s a little murkier.
Many of the crew members come from combat photography, National Geographic wildlife shoots, or even war reporting. They’re adrenaline junkies, filmmakers, and storytellers who live for high-stakes footage. They’re not in it for the comfort—they’re in it for the glory and the story.
They also get some unique perks:
All travel and lodging covered
Food and gear paid for
Serious respect in the TV production world
A legit credit on one of Discovery’s most iconic shows
Plus, for those who love tight-knit crews and shared suffering, Deadliest Catch becomes more than just a job—it becomes a badge of honor.
Getting sick on board is less than ideal… and can escalate quickly.
Don’t miss #DeadliestCatch this TUESDAY at 8p on @Discovery!
— Deadliest Catch (@DeadliestCatch)
1:00 PM • Jul 13, 2024
Life After the Bering Sea
Many Deadliest Catch cameramen move on to other high-end productions or documentary work. Their résumé instantly earns clout in the nonfiction TV industry. But others simply burn out—either physically, emotionally, or because the toll is just too great.
There have even been a few tragic incidents over the years. A camera assistant died while working on a Deadliest Catch spinoff. And like the fishermen they film, cameramen have been injured by loose gear, freezing temps, and exhaustion.
Final Thoughts
The next time you’re watching Deadliest Catch and marveling at the chaos, take a second to appreciate not just the guys wrangling crab, but the ones behind the lens—dodging the same danger, sleeping in the same cramped quarters, and pulling 20-hour shifts in brutal conditions. They might not be hauling pots, but they’re hauling gear, footage, and adrenaline-fueled memories home from the Bering Sea.
And for $3,000 a week? That might just be the most underpaid badass job in television.
Would you survive a season as a Deadliest Catch cameraman? Or are you more of a "watch it from the couch" kind of deckhand?
Quarter Zip Investigates
Reply