John Henry is one of the most fascinating, and at times polarizing, figures in modern sports ownership. To some, he’s the man who delivered the impossible—ending the Boston Red Sox’s 86-year championship drought in 2004 and building a model franchise that has since added three more World Series titles. To others, he’s a reclusive billionaire whose global empire has taken his focus far beyond Fenway Park. Nearly a quarter-century into his Red Sox tenure, Henry’s story is as much about wealth and strategy as it is about fastballs and Fenway.

From Commodities to Billions

Before Henry was sitting in the owner’s box at Fenway, he was sitting at a computer terminal, crunching numbers on commodities. Born in Quincy, Illinois, in 1949, Henry didn’t follow the traditional Wall Street path to riches. Instead, he became a self-taught trader who developed his own models for predicting futures markets.

In the 1980s, his trading company—John W. Henry & Company—grew quickly, capitalizing on algorithmic and systematic trading well before those terms were mainstream. His strategy was disciplined and data-driven, and it earned him massive success. By the time the 1990s rolled around, Henry had built a personal fortune large enough to pursue a dream beyond finance: owning sports teams.

The First Forays into Sports

Henry’s first major sports ownership came in 1999 when he purchased the Florida Marlins. His tenure in Miami was short-lived, but it put him in the inner circles of Major League Baseball owners and set the stage for what was to come.

When the Red Sox came up for sale in 2001, Henry assembled an investment group to buy the team. In early 2002, the deal was finalized: John Henry, along with Tom Werner and Larry Lucchino, became the new stewards of one of baseball’s most storied franchises.

The Red Sox Revolution

The Henry era in Boston started with a clear vision: build a championship organization without tearing down Fenway Park, which had long been criticized as too old and too small. His group invested in player development, analytics, and stadium improvements, blending tradition with modernity.

The payoff came quickly. In 2004, the Red Sox completed one of the greatest comebacks in sports history, rallying from a 3-0 deficit against the New York Yankees in the ALCS before sweeping the St. Louis Cardinals in the World Series. The “Curse of the Bambino” was over.

Henry wasn’t just a lucky owner. He brought a business acumen to baseball that emphasized efficiency and innovation. Under his watch, the Red Sox won additional championships in 2007, 2013, and 2018. For a fan base that had endured decades of heartbreak, four titles in less than 20 years was nothing short of revolutionary.

The Birth of Fenway Sports Group

But Henry’s ambitions were never limited to Boston baseball. In 2001, around the same time he was buying the Red Sox, Henry co-founded what would become Fenway Sports Group (FSG). The idea was straightforward: create a sports conglomerate that could leverage global reach and shared expertise across different franchises.

At first, FSG’s holdings were centered on the Red Sox and Fenway Park. But Henry and his partners thought bigger. They recognized that sports franchises were becoming international brands, and owning just one team was limiting. FSG would instead be a portfolio, and Henry would sit at its helm.

Liverpool and Global Expansion

In 2010, FSG made its boldest move yet: purchasing Liverpool Football Club, one of the most storied teams in English soccer. The move signaled Henry’s desire to expand his empire globally, tapping into soccer’s massive international fan base.

The early years in Liverpool were turbulent, but much like in Boston, FSG emphasized infrastructure, data-driven decisions, and player development. The results eventually came. Under manager Jürgen Klopp, Liverpool won the UEFA Champions League in 2019 and the Premier League in 2020—their first domestic league title in 30 years.

For Henry, Liverpool wasn’t just a business move; it was proof that his organizational model could work across continents and sports.

Adding the Pittsburgh Penguins

In 2021, FSG added another piece to its portfolio: the Pittsburgh Penguins of the NHL. This acquisition was less about global branding and more about solidifying FSG’s position as a multi-sport powerhouse in North America.

The Penguins brought with them a history of success, led by superstars like Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. For Henry, the move diversified FSG’s holdings further and gave the group a foothold in yet another lucrative sports market.

The Red Sox Fan Dilemma

And yet, despite all the championships and all the success, John Henry remains a complicated figure in Boston. Many Red Sox fans feel that the billionaire’s attention has wandered. While the Red Sox have won four titles under his ownership—something unthinkable before 2004—the last few years have been marked by frustration.

Fans point to the trade of Mookie Betts to the Los Angeles Dodgers as the ultimate example of Henry prioritizing finances over fans. Even with titles in hand, Boston’s faithful often question whether their team is still the flagship of Henry’s empire or just one portfolio piece among many.

There’s also the sense that Henry himself has become increasingly distant. He rarely engages with the media or public directly, leaving fans to wonder how committed he is to the day-to-day pulse of Boston baseball.

Balancing Legacy and Business

John Henry’s legacy is secure in one sense: he’ll always be the owner who delivered not just one, but four championships to a city that once thought itself cursed. But his legacy is also global now. Through Fenway Sports Group, he’s not just a baseball owner but one of the most powerful figures in all of sports business.

The balancing act Henry faces is whether he can continue to deliver success in Boston while also tending to Liverpool, the Penguins, and whatever else FSG acquires in the future. Sports fans are passionate, and they want their owners to be just as devoted. Henry’s challenge is proving that a diversified empire doesn’t mean diluted commitment.

From commodities trader to sports mogul, John Henry has lived a career defined by strategy, risk, and vision. The Red Sox, Liverpool, and Penguins may seem like wildly different investments, but for Henry, they’re chapters in the same story: building a sports empire that stretches from Boston to Anfield to Pittsburgh.

For Red Sox fans, the question will always linger—does Henry care more about Fenway Park than the rest of his global holdings? The frustration is understandable, but the results speak for themselves. Four titles in Boston, one Champions League in Liverpool, a Premier League crown, and a winning culture in Pittsburgh suggest that Henry’s model works.

John Henry may never be the most charismatic or beloved owner in sports, but he is undeniably one of the most influential.

And in Boston, for all the complaints, there’s no escaping the fact that the man in the owner’s box delivered the unthinkable.

Have you subscribed to the email newsletter?

Reflecting on a Championship Year: Key Storylines from UConn’s 2024-25 Women’s Basketball Season

Now that it’s September 2025, the 2024-25 UConn Huskies women’s basketball season feels like one of those chapters you reread and appreciate more in hindsight. The highs were high, the pressure was intense, and the narrative arcs—from injury comebacks to freshman breakouts—made this one of Geno Auriemma’s most memorable. Here are the top storylines that shaped UConn’s return to the top.

1. Breaking the Drought: National Championship No. 12

After nearly a decade without the ultimate prize, UConn recaptured the national title in emphatic fashion. In Tampa, they defeated defending champion South Carolina 82-59 in the championship game.

This win was more than just another trophy—it marked UConn reclaiming its place at the summit. They became the program with the most NCAA Women’s Basketball Championships in history, surpassing the men’s record of rival UCLA.

2. Paige Bueckers’ Final Ride & The Passing of a Torch

2024-25 was Paige Bueckers’ final season in NCAA play, and she made it count. Despite battling through injuries in recent seasons, Bueckers led the team in points and assists, and closed her UConn career with perhaps the one title that had eluded her.

Her leadership was unmistakable—not just in stats, but in moments. She carried confidence, but also allowed others to shine, and that balance paid off when it mattered most. Her final game was staying power personified.

3. Azzi Fudd’s Comeback Tour & Final Four MVP Performance

Azzi Fudd returned from a significant injury hiatus with purpose, and this season was her statement. She averaged solid scoring; more importantly, in the Final Four and National Championship, she elevated her game. In the title game, she was named the Most Outstanding Player.

Her senior season will be remembered as one where expectations loomed large—because of past injury concerns—but she met them. Fudd’s story this year was about grit, resilience, and finishing strong.

4. Sarah Strong: Rookie of the Year and Double-Double Power

The #1 recruiting class brought Sarah Strong to Storrs, and she wasted no time making an impact. As a freshman, Strong averaged something like 16.4 points, 8.9 rebounds, and 3.6 assists per game.

Her performance in the National Championship was a highlight: a double-double and contributions across the board (points, rebounds, assists) that underscored how important she was to UConn’s depth and future. Her emergence gives UConn fans confidence that the future is bright—even as stars like Bueckers depart.

5. Big East Domination (Again)

UConn’s dominance in the Big East was reaffirmed in 2024-25. They finished the regular season with just a handful of losses (three), going undefeated in Big East play for a second consecutive season.

They also won the Big East Tournament. The consistency in conference play made it clear that UConn was head and shoulders above most of its Big East peers—control of the league was theirs yet again.

6. Navigating Tough Non-Conference Tests & Early Season Hurdles

Though UConn wrapped up the season strongly, it wasn’t all smooth sailing. Early non-conference schedule included some losses—Notre Dame and USC among them—that exposed vulnerabilities. These were the moments that reminded fans and coaches alike that even a champion needs to stay sharp.

Still, those setbacks perhaps played a key role: they forced adjustments, revealed rotation issues, and built character—all of which came into play during March. The team’s ability to learn from losses made their championship run feel more earned.

7. Coaching Milestones: Geno Auriemma’s Continued Legacy

In 2024-25, Geno Auriemma added yet again to his résumé. Not only did he guide the Huskies to another title, but this one carried special weight: solidifying his status even further among the greatest coaches in college basketball history.

Also worth noting: expectations were enormous this season. From media, from fans, from peers. Managing those expectations—especially with key players returning from injury—became a storyline itself. Auriemma showed again that leadership isn’t just about Xs and Os, but about resilience under pressure.

8. Depth & Bench Contributions: Adjustments That Mattered

UConn’s starters got the headlines, but some of the season’s turning points came from role players stepping up. Bench contributions down the stretch—both during the Big East Tournament and the NCAA Tournament—helped UConn maintain momentum when starters needed breaths.

Injuries and load management meant the rotation was tested. Younger players got big minutes. That played into a narrative of not just star power, but program depth. And having that depth turned out to be crucial when fatigue, opponents’ scouting, and high-pressure moments piled up.

9. The “Big Three” Narrative: Bueckers, Fudd, Strong

By mid-season, many analysts and fans were referring to Paige Bueckers, Azzi Fudd, and Sarah Strong as UConn’s “Big Three” — a reference not just to scoring or star power but to how each complemented the other.

Bueckers’ playmaking and leadership, Fudd’s comeback and scoring punch, Strong’s rebounding and all-around hustle—together they made UConn harder to beat. Opponents could try to focus on one, but the Huskies had enough threats to cover each other. That dynamic felt different from previous years.

10. Championship Expectations Met—But Looking Ahead

Finally, September 2025 gives the luxury of reflection: not only did UConn meet massive expectations (national title, dominance, star performances), but they set a standard going into the next season. The question shifts now: how will UConn replace those who leave, keep up the standard, and possibly attempt back-to-back?

Losing Paige Bueckers to the WNBA is one thing, but with Azzi Fudd returning, Sarah Strong on trajectory, and younger pieces stepping up, UConn’s foundation seems healthy. The bar is high, but this past season suggests the Huskies have the tools—and the mindset—to stay at or near the top.

A Season That Reignited the Huskies’ Flame

Looking back now, in the early autumn of 2025, the 2024-25 UConn women’s season isn't just another entry in the record books. It was a reclamation: of prestige, confidence, and legacy. They broke the title drought, they saw star players finish strong, and they ushered in new ones with promise.

For fans, it's also season that reminds you why you invest your emotions in college basketball: the comebacks, the pressure, the drama. UConn’s narrative in 2024-25 had all of that—and then some.

As we shift to the upcoming season, the lens changes from what was to what could be. How will UConn adjust without Bueckers? Can Fudd keep ascending? Will Strong continue to grow? Can Geno and the staff maintain the consistency—especially with everyone watching?

If 2024-25 taught us anything, it's that even after years of trials, expectations, and near misses, greatness is never truly gone—it just takes the right moment to spark again.

Have you subscribed to the email newsletter?

Why Don’t We See More WWII Naval Battle Movies?

When we think about World War II on screen, certain images immediately come to mind: the storming of Normandy in Saving Private Ryan, the Pacific island struggles of The Pacific, or the air battles in Dunkirk and Midway. Hollywood has given us plenty of infantry and aerial combat, but one major part of the war often gets overlooked—naval battles.

Considering that WWII was as much a war of ships and supply lines as it was of tanks and trenches, you’d think we’d have a steady flow of movies about epic clashes at sea. So why don’t we?

The Challenges of Scale

First, naval battles are massive in scope and incredibly complex. We’re talking about fleets spread over miles of ocean, hundreds of sailors performing different duties, and engagements that can last for hours without the kind of close-up, personal drama Hollywood thrives on.

Directors love storytelling at the human level—tight squads of soldiers, desperate foxholes, the face-to-face tension of combat. Ships battling at long distances don’t naturally lend themselves to that same intimacy. When your “characters” are giant carriers and destroyers firing at specks on the horizon, it’s hard to keep an audience emotionally invested.

Technical and Production Hurdles

Another reason? Filming naval warfare convincingly is difficult and expensive. Modern audiences expect realism, and recreating 1940s warships on the open ocean—or digitally—requires huge budgets. It’s no coincidence that one of the few modern naval-focused WWII films, Greyhound (2020), leaned heavily on CGI for its Atlantic convoy battles. Even then, the film was more of a tight, tense character study with Tom Hanks at the helm than a sweeping depiction of naval warfare.

Compare that to infantry battles, which can be recreated on land with relative ease using extras, pyrotechnics, and some clever set design. Naval battles? You’re either building massive ship replicas, spending a fortune on digital effects, or both.

The Storytelling Gap

Naval battles are often won or lost through strategy, codebreaking, and logistics—things that don’t always translate well on screen. Take the Battle of the Atlantic, for example. The Allies’ victory hinged on advancements in radar, sonar, and breaking the Enigma code. Incredible stuff in terms of history, but not exactly the kind of thing that lights up a theater unless you focus on the human side of the story.

That’s why when naval battles do show up in films, they often narrow in on a handful of characters to make the drama relatable. Das Boot (though technically about a German U-boat in WWII) is brilliant because it captures the claustrophobic, human cost of submarine warfare rather than trying to stage every aspect of naval combat.

Infantry and Air Battles Steal the Spotlight

There’s also the reality that infantry and aerial combat simply dominate the WWII cinematic canon. The visuals are visceral—boots on the ground, dogfights in the sky. Hollywood has spent decades building tropes around these kinds of battles, while naval warfare has remained niche.

Movies like Saving Private Ryan or series like Band of Brothers thrive because audiences can easily connect with the soldiers on screen. Meanwhile, the Navy has rarely gotten that same emotional treatment—though it’s worth noting that when done well, naval films (Master and Commander, Greyhound, or The Cruel Sea) earn critical acclaim.

Missed Opportunities

That doesn’t mean naval battles lack cinematic potential. Imagine a high-stakes film about the Battle of Midway told from multiple perspectives—American pilots, Japanese admirals, and sailors caught in the chaos below deck. Or a miniseries that tracks a single destroyer escort across the Atlantic, fighting U-boats, battling weather, and dealing with exhaustion and loss.

There are real stories, too, that remain largely untold on screen—the USS Indianapolis tragedy, convoy PQ 17 in the Arctic, or the relentless duel between Allied convoys and German wolfpacks. These are stories rich with drama, danger, and humanity.

The Future of Naval Storytelling

Streaming platforms might be the best hope for a naval resurgence. A film might struggle to capture the complexity of a battle like Leyte Gulf, but a limited series could give it the room it needs. We’ve already seen how platforms like HBO and Netflix have brought new depth to WWII storytelling—why not the Navy’s role?

And as visual effects become more affordable and convincing, it may finally be possible to bring large-scale naval clashes to life without requiring blockbuster budgets.

The absence of WWII naval battle films isn’t because the stories lack importance—it’s because they pose unique challenges for filmmakers. They’re big, expensive, and logistically difficult to execute while still delivering the human-centered drama audiences crave.

Still, the ocean remains one of the last great cinematic frontiers of WWII storytelling. If the right filmmaker takes the plunge, we might finally see naval warfare get the spotlight it deserves—an epic saga of steel, storm, and sacrifice.

Quarter Zip Investigates

July 30 - Why Did Stockton Rush Insist on Using Carbon Fiber for the Titan Sub

July 31 Artistic Liberties in Black Mass, the 2015 Whitey Bulger film

August 1 Life for the Camera Crew on Deadliest Catch

August 4 Life on a Commercial Fishing Boat for the Fishermen

August 11 Whitey Bulger’s Final Chapter: Murder in a West Virginia Prison

August 14 Whitey Bulger’s Unique Sports Betting Scheme

August 18 Whitey Bulger and CIA Mind Control Experiments

August 20 Whitey Bulger vs. The Italians

September 10 The Rise and Fall of German U-Boats in WWII

Have you subscribed to the email newsletter?